OEX Trading System Revised
- hypothetical · Annual Return (Compounded)
- 0.0%
- Max Drawdown
- 100.0%
- Trades
- 244
- Win Trades
- 81.6%
- Profit Factor
- 0.90
- Win Months
- 2.3%
About this strategy
There will be no stop loss. This new version of the system has been tested back to 2/1/1978 and has yielded +70% of winning trades. In some of the trades, the total investment may be lost, but this high winning percentage, coupled with the fact that -when going long with calls and puts- losses are limited to 100%, while profits are unlimited, will prove fruitful. Over the last 28 years, the system has produced an average return of 2780% annually (in one of the most conservative approaches to performance calculation; please, see statistics for the system best-case scenario below). Hence, for a minimum investment of $ 1,000 per trade, the gain would have been $27,800 per year. On the one hand, supressing the stop loss seems to maximize returns and, on the other hand, the conservative 1/10 trade allocation will act as a "buffer" for the effects of any possible drawdown.
This system works and will prove it. It is true that, after being in the top ten C2 systems for a long time, there were important drawdowns due to oversizing. But the system does not set position size, so the wrong asset allocation was my own responsability. I will keep "OEX T. S. Revised" running, although have also launched its "twin" version, "Trade4Freedom" so as to supress the noise from my own past shortcomings. One must not deny or hide them, but learn from them and reduce previous errors to "history".
"OEX Trading System R." Statistics (since 2/01/1978 to date) (1)
No. of trades: 4,533
% winning trades: 72.1%
Average profit per + trade: 48.5% SD: 46,9
Average loss per - trade: 50.7% SD: 32
Total gain: 94,251.8%
Annual average gain: 3,366.1 %
Max. no. of consecutive + trades: 26
Max. no. of consecutive - trades: 7
Best trade: +581.5 %
Worst trade: -100%
(1) Statistics for the 4 subsystems combined, and taking different lots of trades within one particular option as separate trades (please look for reference to "lots trading" in the following paragraphs).
6/01/2006
____________________________________________________________________
OEX T. S. Revised delivers limit orders only, generally at market open and close. This means that you will only have to check its C2 page during 15 minutes before the close or up to 15 minutes after the open -therefore, you just need to commit 30 minutes of your time daily to follow the system. First a BTO (buy to open) limit order will be issued, followed eventually by a STC (sell to close) one at a limit price too.
Do not rely on e-mails to follow the system, they are not fast enough for many of the trades recommended. Open instead the ITM (instant trade messenger) window by clicking on the corresponding icon you will find on the left side of OEX T. S. page. This way signals will be received in real time.
There may be more than one trade open simultaneously -up to four. This is because the revised version comprises of four different systems
-I prefer to call them "subsystems". Sometimes, all of the positions taken are calls or puts, or they can also be opposite ones, for example, one put and one call.
The system does not average down or up. But, when there is a position open, it tends to issue signals to buy more contracts of the same option. These are really different trades or "lots" issued from different subsystems. It is more convenient to buy options at or near the money and not to spread four positions over four different options whose strike prices may be quite out/in the money. Also, it may simplify order management. For instance, it is difficult to close four positions and open another four right at the close or open. But if you put these four positions in the same option or "basket", grouping together different "lots" of contracts, the procedure becomes much easier. For this reason, sometimes, the system will buy contracts for a total amount of $10,000 or $15,000 -instead of $5,000, which is 1/10 of its total cash available at the moment. This is because two or three of the subsystems have issued the same signal and all of the trades are being clustered together in a single one. Frequently, you will also observe that only 1/3 or 2/3 of the position is closed initially. This is due to the fact that a closing signal has been issued by only one or two of the subsystems, while the remaining one/s stays long.
Obviously, it would be ideal that C2 provided for "lots trading", so that any of these "lots" transactions were recorded as a separate trade by C2 statistics. In fact, I have made this particular suggestion to its administrator.
The revised version of OEX T. S. is a 100% "mechanical" -versus "discretionary"-model and, mainly, an anti-trend system, which means that it will work most efficiently when there is no trend in the market -which happens most of the time. But it will fail when there is a clear medium trend. However, this circumstance will not affect the overall results, which have been carefully tested back and proved outstanding historically. Over the above mentioned period of 28 years, there has been a maximum of seven losing trades in a raw. It happened just once -ending on 12/01/1980-, and taking each lot of contracts separately, i.e. as different positions. For that reason, from the perspective of new subscribers, it is advised to wait for one losing trade -since different trades will be now clustered together in one single position- so as to get ready to invest their own cash when the next signal arrives.
For those wanting information on options trading would recommed the learning center of the Chicago Board Options Exchange (www.cboe.com). Also, to find out the equivalence between the option symbols -included in the signals- on the one hand, and the strike price and expiration on the other, you may find this link useful: us.etrade.com/e/t/invest/quotesandresearch.
Hypothetical Monthly Returns (includes fees/commissions)
| Year | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec | YTD |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2005 | 54.4 | 1.9 | 34.9 | 66.3 | -5.9 | -2.8 | 23.5 | -34.8 | -4.8 | -17.3 | 104.6 | ||
| 2006 | -42.6 | -40.5 | -100.8 | -2015.7 | -110.5 | -1005.4 | 21.6 | -91.0 | -1157.1 | -23.1 | -66.3 | -0.6 | -111.4 |
| 2007 | -0.6 | -0.6 | -0.6 | 0.0 | -0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | |
| 2008 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | -10.6 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | |
| 2009 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | |
| 2010 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | |
| 2011 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | |
| 2012 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | |
| 2013 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | |
| 2014 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | |
| 2015 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | |
| 2016 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | |
| 2017 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | |
| 2018 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | |
| 2019 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | ||
| 2020 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | |
| 2021 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | |
| 2022 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | |
| 2023 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | |
| 2024 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | |
| 2025 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | |
| 2026 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
Statistics
Overview
| Strategy began | 3/25/2005 |
|---|---|
| Suggested Minimum Capital | $100,000 |
| Age | 261 months |
| What it trades | Options |
| # Trades | 244 |
| # Profitable | 199 |
| % Profitable | 81.6% |
| Avg trade duration | 2.5 days |
| Max peak-to-valley drawdown | 100.0% |
| drawdown period | May 18, 2006 - May 24, 2006 |
| Annual Return (Compounded) | 0.0% |
| Avg win | $5,678 |
| Avg loss | $26,732 |
Ratios
| W:L ratio | 0.94 |
|---|---|
| Sharpe Ratio | 0.77 |
| Sortino Ratio | 3.76 |
| Calmar Ratio | -0.01 |
CORRELATION STATISTICS
| Correlation to SP500 | 0.00 |
|---|---|
| Return Percent SP500 (cumu) during strategy life | 550.8% |
| Return of Strat Pcnt - Return of SP500 Pcnt (cumu) | -679.8% |
Return Statistics
| Ann Return (w trading costs) | 0.0% |
|---|---|
| Return Pcnt (Compound or Annual, age-based, NFA compliant) | 0.0% |
| Return Pcnt Since TOS Status | 0.0% |
| Ann Return (Compnd, No Fees) | -5.9% |
Slump
| Current Slump as Pcnt Equity | — |
|---|---|
| Current Slump, time of slump as pcnt of strategy life | 1.0% |
Instruments
| Percent Trades Forex | 0.0% |
|---|---|
| Percent Trades Futures | 0.0% |
| Percent Trades Options | 1.0% |
| Percent Trades Stocks | 0.0% |
Risk of Ruin (Monte-Carlo)
| Chance of 10% account loss | 100.0% |
|---|---|
| Chance of 20% account loss | 100.0% |
| Chance of 30% account loss | 100.0% |
| Chance of 40% account loss | 100.0% |
| Chance of 50% account loss | 100.0% |
| Chance of 60% account loss (Monte Carlo) | 100.0% |
| Chance of 70% account loss (Monte Carlo) | 100.0% |
| Chance of 80% account loss (Monte Carlo) | 100.0% |
| Chance of 90% account loss (Monte Carlo) | 100.0% |
| Chance of 100% account loss (Monte Carlo) | 100.0% |
Automation
| Percentage Signals Automated | 0.0% |
|---|
Popularity
| Popularity (Today) | 0 |
|---|---|
| Popularity (Last 6 weeks) | 0 |
| Popularity (7 days, Percentile 1000 scale) | 0 |
Trading Style
| Any stock shorts? 0/1 | 0 |
|---|
Trades-Own-System Certification
| Trades Own System? | 0 |
|---|---|
| TOS percent | 0.0% |
Win / Loss
| Avg Loss | $26,732 |
|---|---|
| Avg Win | $5,678 |
| # Winners | 199 |
| Sum Trade PL (losers) | $1,202,955 |
| Sum Trade PL (winners) | $1,129,931 |
| Num Months Winners | 5 |
| # Losers | 45 |
| % Winners | 81.6% |
Dividends
| Dividends Received in Model Acct | 0 |
|---|
Age
| Num Months filled monthly returns table | 13 |
|---|
Frequency
| Avg Position Time (mins) | 3574.18 |
|---|---|
| Avg Position Time (hrs) | 59.57 |
| Avg Trade Length | 2.50 |
| Last Trade Ago | 7238 |
Regression
| Alpha | 0 |
|---|---|
| Beta | 0.05 |
| Treynor Index | 0 |
Maximum Adverse Excursion (MAE)
| MAE:Equity, average, all trades | 0.38 |
|---|---|
| MAE:Equity, 95th Percentile Value for this strat | 0 |
| MAE:Equity, average, losing trades | 0.52 |
| MAE:Equity, losing trades only, 95th Percentile Value for this strat | — |
| MAE:Equity, average, winning trades | 0.34 |
| MAE:Equity, win trades only, 95th Percentile Value for this strat | — |
| Avg(MAE) / Avg(PL) - All trades | -4.62 |
| MAE:PL (avg, all trades) | 1.27 |
| MAE:PL (avg, losing trades) | — |
| MAE:PL - Losing Trades - this strat Percentile of All Strats | 11.79 |
| MAE:PL - Winning Trades - this strat Percentile of All Strats | 51.27 |
| MAE:PL (avg, winning trades) | — |
| MAE:PL - worst single value for strategy | — |
| Avg(MAE) / Avg(PL) - Winning trades | 1.26 |
| Avg(MAE) / Avg(PL) - Losing trades | -1.15 |
| Hold-and-Hope Ratio | -0.22 |
RATIO STATISTICS
| Mean | 0.53 |
|---|---|
| SD | 1.59 |
| Sharpe ratio (Glass type estimate) | 0.34 |
| Sharpe ratio (Hedges UMVUE) | 0.33 |
| df | 95 |
| t | 0.95 |
| p | 0.17 |
| Lowerbound of 95% confidence interval for Sharpe Ratio | -0.36 |
| Upperbound of 95% confidence interval for Sharpe Ratio | 1.03 |
| Lowerbound of 95% CI (Gibbons, Hedeker & Davis approximation | -0.36 |
| Upperbound of 95% CI (Gibbons, Hedeker & Davis approximation | 1.03 |
| Sortino ratio | 1.26 |
| Upside Potential Ratio | 2.13 |
| Upside part of mean | 0.90 |
| Downside part of mean | -0.37 |
| Upside SD | 1.53 |
| Downside SD | 0.42 |
| N nonnegative terms | 86 |
| N negative terms | 10 |
| N of observations | 96 |
| Mean of predictor | 0.17 |
| Mean of criterion | 0.53 |
| SD of predictor | 0.22 |
| SD of criterion | 1.59 |
| Covariance | -0.10 |
| r | -0.28 |
| b (slope, estimate of beta) | -2.05 |
| a (intercept, estimate of alpha) | 0.88 |
| Mean Square Error | 2.35 |
| DF error | 94 |
| t(b) | -2.81 |
| p(b) | 1.00 |
| t(a) | 1.58 |
| p(a) | 0.06 |
| Lowerbound of 95% confidence interval for beta | -3.50 |
| Upperbound of 95% confidence interval for beta | -0.60 |
| Lowerbound of 95% confidence interval for alpha | -0.22 |
| Upperbound of 95% confidence interval for alpha | 1.98 |
| Treynor index (mean / b) | -0.26 |
| Jensen alpha (a) | 0.88 |
| Mean | -0.01 |
| SD | 0.95 |
| Sharpe ratio (Glass type estimate) | -0.01 |
| Sharpe ratio (Hedges UMVUE) | -0.01 |
| df | 95 |
| t | -0.03 |
| p | 0.51 |
| Lowerbound of 95% confidence interval for Sharpe Ratio | -0.70 |
| Upperbound of 95% confidence interval for Sharpe Ratio | 0.68 |
| Lowerbound of 95% CI (Gibbons, Hedeker & Davis approximation | -0.70 |
| Upperbound of 95% CI (Gibbons, Hedeker & Davis approximation | 0.68 |
| Sortino ratio | -0.02 |
| Upside Potential Ratio | 0.78 |
| Upside part of mean | 0.51 |
| Downside part of mean | -0.52 |
| Upside SD | 0.68 |
| Downside SD | 0.66 |
| N nonnegative terms | 86 |
| N negative terms | 10 |
| N of observations | 96 |
| Mean of predictor | 0.15 |
| Mean of criterion | -0.01 |
| SD of predictor | 0.22 |
| SD of criterion | 0.95 |
| Covariance | -0.04 |
| r | -0.18 |
| b (slope, estimate of beta) | -0.77 |
| a (intercept, estimate of alpha) | 0.10 |
| Mean Square Error | 0.88 |
| DF error | 94 |
| t(b) | -1.73 |
| p(b) | 0.96 |
| t(a) | 0.30 |
| p(a) | 0.38 |
| Lowerbound of 95% confidence interval for beta | -1.65 |
| Upperbound of 95% confidence interval for beta | 0.11 |
| Lowerbound of 95% confidence interval for alpha | -0.57 |
| Upperbound of 95% confidence interval for alpha | 0.77 |
| Treynor index (mean / b) | 0.01 |
| Jensen alpha (a) | 0.10 |
| VaR(95%) | 0.36 |
| Expected Shortfall on VaR | 0.43 |
| VaR(95%) | 0.01 |
| Expected Shortfall on VaR | 0.06 |
| Mean | 9.65 |
| SD | 9.86 |
| Sharpe ratio (Glass type estimate) | 0.98 |
| Sharpe ratio (Hedges UMVUE) | 0.98 |
| df | 2113 |
| t | 2.78 |
| p | 0.00 |
| Lowerbound of 95% confidence interval for Sharpe Ratio | 0.29 |
| Upperbound of 95% confidence interval for Sharpe Ratio | 1.67 |
| Lowerbound of 95% CI (Gibbons, Hedeker & Davis approximation | 0.29 |
| Upperbound of 95% CI (Gibbons, Hedeker & Davis approximation | 1.67 |
| Sortino ratio | 8.70 |
| Upside Potential Ratio | 11.00 |
| Upside part of mean | 12.21 |
| Downside part of mean | -2.55 |
| Upside SD | 9.82 |
| Downside SD | 1.11 |
| N nonnegative terms | 1913 |
| N negative terms | 201 |
| N of observations | 2114 |
| Mean of predictor | 0.31 |
| Mean of criterion | 9.65 |
| SD of predictor | 0.59 |
| SD of criterion | 9.86 |
| Covariance | -1.72 |
| r | -0.29 |
| b (slope, estimate of beta) | -4.88 |
| a (intercept, estimate of alpha) | 11.16 |
| Mean Square Error | 88.95 |
| DF error | 2112 |
| t(b) | -14.13 |
| p(b) | 1 |
| t(a) | 3.36 |
| p(a) | 0.00 |
| Lowerbound of 95% confidence interval for beta | -5.55 |
| Upperbound of 95% confidence interval for beta | -4.20 |
| Lowerbound of 95% confidence interval for alpha | 4.65 |
| Upperbound of 95% confidence interval for alpha | 17.68 |
| Treynor index (mean / b) | -1.98 |
| Jensen alpha (a) | 11.16 |
| Mean | -0.01 |
| SD | 3.58 |
| Sharpe ratio (Glass type estimate) | -0.00 |
| Sharpe ratio (Hedges UMVUE) | -0.00 |
| df | 2113 |
| t | -0.01 |
| p | 0.50 |
| Lowerbound of 95% confidence interval for Sharpe Ratio | -0.69 |
| Upperbound of 95% confidence interval for Sharpe Ratio | 0.69 |
| Lowerbound of 95% CI (Gibbons, Hedeker & Davis approximation | -0.69 |
| Upperbound of 95% CI (Gibbons, Hedeker & Davis approximation | 0.69 |
| Sortino ratio | -0.00 |
| Upside Potential Ratio | 1.71 |
| Upside part of mean | 4.31 |
| Downside part of mean | -4.32 |
| Upside SD | 2.55 |
| Downside SD | 2.51 |
| N nonnegative terms | 1913 |
| N negative terms | 201 |
| N of observations | 2114 |
| Mean of predictor | 0.13 |
| Mean of criterion | -0.01 |
| SD of predictor | 0.59 |
| SD of criterion | 3.58 |
| Covariance | -0.90 |
| r | -0.42 |
| b (slope, estimate of beta) | -2.54 |
| a (intercept, estimate of alpha) | 0.33 |
| Mean Square Error | 10.56 |
| DF error | 2112 |
| t(b) | -21.35 |
| p(b) | 1 |
| t(a) | 0.29 |
| p(a) | 0.39 |
| Lowerbound of 95% confidence interval for beta | -2.77 |
| Upperbound of 95% confidence interval for beta | -2.31 |
| Lowerbound of 95% confidence interval for alpha | -1.91 |
| Upperbound of 95% confidence interval for alpha | 2.57 |
| Treynor index (mean / b) | 0.00 |
| Jensen alpha (a) | 0.33 |
| VaR(95%) | 0.31 |
| Expected Shortfall on VaR | 0.36 |
| VaR(95%) | 0.00 |
| Expected Shortfall on VaR | 0.02 |
| Mean | 0 |
| SD | 0 |
| Sharpe ratio (Glass type estimate) | 0 |
| Sharpe ratio (Hedges UMVUE) | 0 |
| df | 0 |
| t | 0 |
| p | 0 |
| Lowerbound of 95% confidence interval for Sharpe Ratio | 0 |
| Upperbound of 95% confidence interval for Sharpe Ratio | 0 |
| Lowerbound of 95% CI (Gibbons, Hedeker & Davis approximation | 0 |
| Upperbound of 95% CI (Gibbons, Hedeker & Davis approximation | 0 |
| Sortino ratio | 0 |
| Upside Potential Ratio | 0 |
| Upside part of mean | 0 |
| Downside part of mean | 0 |
| Upside SD | 0 |
| Downside SD | 0 |
| N nonnegative terms | 131 |
| N negative terms | 0 |
| N of observations | 131 |
| Mean of predictor | 1.11 |
| Mean of criterion | 0 |
| SD of predictor | 0.69 |
| SD of criterion | 0 |
| Covariance | 0 |
| r | 0 |
| b (slope, estimate of beta) | 0 |
| a (intercept, estimate of alpha) | 0 |
| Mean Square Error | 0 |
| DF error | 0 |
| t(b) | 0 |
| p(b) | 0 |
| t(a) | 0 |
| p(a) | 0 |
| Lowerbound of 95% confidence interval for beta | 0 |
| Upperbound of 95% confidence interval for beta | 0 |
| Lowerbound of 95% confidence interval for alpha | 0 |
| Upperbound of 95% confidence interval for alpha | 0 |
| Treynor index (mean / b) | 0 |
| Jensen alpha (a) | 0 |
| Mean | 0 |
| SD | 0 |
| Sharpe ratio (Glass type estimate) | 0 |
| Sharpe ratio (Hedges UMVUE) | 0 |
| df | 0 |
| t | 0 |
| p | 0 |
| Lowerbound of 95% confidence interval for Sharpe Ratio | 0 |
| Upperbound of 95% confidence interval for Sharpe Ratio | 0 |
| Lowerbound of 95% CI (Gibbons, Hedeker & Davis approximation | 0 |
| Upperbound of 95% CI (Gibbons, Hedeker & Davis approximation | 0 |
| Sortino ratio | 0 |
| Upside Potential Ratio | 0 |
| Upside part of mean | 0 |
| Downside part of mean | 0 |
| Upside SD | 0 |
| Downside SD | 0 |
| N nonnegative terms | 131 |
| N negative terms | 0 |
| N of observations | 131 |
| Mean of predictor | 0.85 |
| Mean of criterion | 0 |
| SD of predictor | 0.76 |
| SD of criterion | 0 |
| Covariance | 0 |
| r | 0 |
| b (slope, estimate of beta) | 0 |
| a (intercept, estimate of alpha) | 0 |
| Mean Square Error | 0 |
| DF error | 0 |
| t(b) | 0 |
| p(b) | 0 |
| t(a) | 0 |
| p(a) | 0 |
| Lowerbound of 95% confidence interval for beta | 0 |
| VAR (95 Confidence Intrvl) | 0.30 |
| Upperbound of 95% confidence interval for beta | 0 |
| Lowerbound of 95% confidence interval for alpha | 0 |
| Upperbound of 95% confidence interval for alpha | 0 |
| Treynor index (mean / b) | 0 |
| Jensen alpha (a) | 0 |
| VaR(95%) | 0 |
| Expected Shortfall on VaR | 0 |
| VaR(95%) | 0 |
| Expected Shortfall on VaR | 0 |
ORDER STATISTICS
| Number of observations | 96 |
|---|---|
| Minimum | 0.31 |
| Quartile 1 | 1 |
| Median | 1 |
| Quartile 3 | 1 |
| Maximum | 5.13 |
| Mean of quarter 1 | 0.88 |
| Mean of quarter 2 | 1 |
| Mean of quarter 3 | 1 |
| Mean of quarter 4 | 1.30 |
| Inter Quartile Range | 0 |
| Number outliers low | 10 |
| Percentage of outliers low | 0.10 |
| Mean of outliers low | 0.71 |
| Number of outliers high | 12 |
| Percentage of outliers high | 0.12 |
| Mean of outliers high | 1.60 |
| Extreme Value Index (moments method) | 0 |
| VaR(95%) (moments method) | 0 |
| Expected Shortfall (moments method) | 0 |
| Extreme Value Index (regression method) | -0.18 |
| VaR(95%) (regression method) | 0.14 |
| Expected Shortfall (regression method) | 0.28 |
| Number of observations | 2114 |
| Minimum | 0.07 |
| Quartile 1 | 1 |
| Median | 1 |
| Quartile 3 | 1 |
| Maximum | 14.20 |
| Mean of quarter 1 | 0.96 |
| Mean of quarter 2 | 1 |
| Mean of quarter 3 | 1 |
| Mean of quarter 4 | 1.19 |
| Inter Quartile Range | 0 |
| Number outliers low | 201 |
| Percentage of outliers low | 0.10 |
| Mean of outliers low | 0.90 |
| Number of outliers high | 193 |
| Percentage of outliers high | 0.09 |
| Mean of outliers high | 1.51 |
| Extreme Value Index (moments method) | 0.75 |
| VaR(95%) (moments method) | 0.00 |
| Expected Shortfall (moments method) | 0.02 |
| Extreme Value Index (regression method) | 0 |
| VaR(95%) (regression method) | 0 |
| Expected Shortfall (regression method) | 0 |
| Number of observations | 131 |
| Minimum | 1 |
| Quartile 1 | 1 |
| Median | 1 |
| Quartile 3 | 1 |
| Maximum | 1 |
| Mean of quarter 1 | 1 |
| Mean of quarter 2 | 1 |
| Mean of quarter 3 | 1 |
| Mean of quarter 4 | 1 |
| Inter Quartile Range | 0 |
| Number outliers low | 0 |
| Percentage of outliers low | 0 |
| Mean of outliers low | 0 |
| Number of outliers high | 0 |
| Percentage of outliers high | 0 |
| Mean of outliers high | 0 |
| Extreme Value Index (moments method) | 0 |
| VaR(95%) (moments method) | 0 |
| Expected Shortfall (moments method) | 0 |
| Extreme Value Index (regression method) | 0 |
| VaR(95%) (regression method) | 0 |
| Expected Shortfall (regression method) | 0 |
DRAW DOWN STATISTICS
| Number of observations | 3 |
|---|---|
| Minimum | 0.08 |
| Quartile 1 | 0.33 |
| Median | 0.58 |
| Quartile 3 | 0.76 |
| Maximum | 0.94 |
| Mean of quarter 1 | 0.08 |
| Mean of quarter 2 | 0.58 |
| Mean of quarter 3 | 0 |
| Mean of quarter 4 | 0.94 |
| Inter Quartile Range | 0.43 |
| Number outliers low | 0 |
| Percentage of outliers low | 0 |
| Mean of outliers low | 0 |
| Number of outliers high | 0 |
| Percentage of outliers high | 0 |
| Mean of outliers high | 0 |
| Extreme Value Index (moments method) | 0 |
| VaR(95%) (moments method) | 0 |
| Expected Shortfall (moments method) | 0 |
| Extreme Value Index (regression method) | 0 |
| VaR(95%) (regression method) | 0 |
| Expected Shortfall (regression method) | 0 |
| Number of observations | 14 |
| Minimum | 0.00 |
| Quartile 1 | 0.02 |
| Median | 0.24 |
| Quartile 3 | 0.87 |
| Maximum | 0.95 |
| Mean of quarter 1 | 0.00 |
| Mean of quarter 2 | 0.07 |
| Mean of quarter 3 | 0.55 |
| Mean of quarter 4 | 0.92 |
| Inter Quartile Range | 0.86 |
| Number outliers low | 0 |
| Percentage of outliers low | 0 |
| Mean of outliers low | 0 |
| Number of outliers high | 0 |
| Percentage of outliers high | 0 |
| Mean of outliers high | 0 |
| Extreme Value Index (moments method) | -15.47 |
| VaR(95%) (moments method) | 0.93 |
| Expected Shortfall (moments method) | 0.93 |
| Extreme Value Index (regression method) | -1.74 |
| VaR(95%) (regression method) | 0.95 |
| Expected Shortfall (regression method) | 0.95 |
| Number of observations | 0 |
| Minimum | 0 |
| Quartile 1 | 0 |
| Median | 0 |
| Quartile 3 | 0 |
| Maximum | 0 |
| Mean of quarter 1 | 0 |
| Mean of quarter 2 | 0 |
| Mean of quarter 3 | 0 |
| Mean of quarter 4 | 0 |
| Inter Quartile Range | 0 |
| Number outliers low | 0 |
| Percentage of outliers low | 0 |
| Mean of outliers low | 0 |
| Number of outliers high | 0 |
| Percentage of outliers high | 0 |
| Mean of outliers high | 0 |
| Extreme Value Index (moments method) | 0 |
| VaR(95%) (moments method) | 0 |
| Expected Shortfall (moments method) | 0 |
| Extreme Value Index (regression method) | 0 |
| VaR(95%) (regression method) | 0 |
| Expected Shortfall (regression method) | 0 |
| Strat Max DD how much worse than SP500 max DD during strat life? | -394893536 |
| Max Equity Drawdown (num days) | 6 |
| Last 4 Months - Pcnt Negative | 1.0% |
COMBINED STATISTICS
| Annualized return (arithmetic extrapolation) | -0.01 |
|---|---|
| Compounded annual return (geometric extrapolation) | -0.01 |
| Calmar ratio (compounded annual return / max draw down) | -0.01 |
| Compounded annual return / average of 25% largest draw downs | -0.01 |
| Compounded annual return / Expected Shortfall lognormal | -0.03 |
| j156mfCOMBRisPar | 0 |
| j157mfCOMBRisPar | 0 |
| Annualized return (arithmetic extrapolation) | -0.01 |
| Compounded annual return (geometric extrapolation) | -0.01 |
| Calmar ratio (compounded annual return / max draw down) | -0.01 |
| Compounded annual return / average of 25% largest draw downs | -0.01 |
| Compounded annual return / Expected Shortfall lognormal | -0.03 |
| j313dfCOMBRisPar | 0 |
| j314dfCOMBRisPar | 0 |
| Annualized return (arithmetic extrapolation) | 0 |
| Compounded annual return (geometric extrapolation) | 0 |
| Calmar ratio (compounded annual return / max draw down) | 0 |
| Compounded annual return / average of 25% largest draw downs | 0 |
| Compounded annual return / Expected Shortfall lognormal | 0 |
Trading record
Placed 111 trades in real-life brokerage accounts.
| Symbol | Side | Qty | Opened | Closed | P/L |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OEYWF | long | 44 | Oct 16, 2006 | Nov 18, 2006 | ($15,601) |
| OEYVT | long | 28 | Sep 12, 2006 | Oct 21, 2006 | ($14,818) |
| OEYJE | long | 17 | Oct 10, 2006 | Oct 16, 2006 | $6,876 |
| OEYJA | long | 21 | Sep 11, 2006 | Sep 12, 2006 | $5,641 |
| OEBUQ | long | 105 | Aug 15, 2006 | Sep 12, 2006 | ($16,857) |
| OEYIT | long | 8 | Aug 24, 2006 | Aug 28, 2006 | $789 |
| OEBTQ | long | 29 | Jul 25, 2006 | Aug 16, 2006 | ($10,451) |
| OEBIQ | long | 12 | Aug 7, 2006 | Aug 16, 2006 | $3,873 |
| OEBHP | long | 24 | Jul 12, 2006 | Jul 25, 2006 | $2,186 |
| OEBTP | long | 17 | Jul 19, 2006 | Jul 24, 2006 | $2,886 |
| OEBSN | long | 51 | Jun 15, 2006 | Jul 13, 2006 | $1,289 |
| OEBSP | long | 20 | Jun 29, 2006 | Jul 12, 2006 | $1,572 |
| OEBGN | long | 13 | Jun 28, 2006 | Jun 29, 2006 | $5,772 |
| OEBGN | long | 11 | Jun 26, 2006 | Jun 27, 2006 | $1,085 |
| OEBGN | long | 5 | Jun 19, 2006 | Jun 21, 2006 | $743 |
| OEBFS | long | 18 | May 12, 2006 | Jun 17, 2006 | ($11,901) |
| OEBFP | long | 25 | Jun 6, 2006 | Jun 15, 2006 | ($13,900) |
| OEBRQ | long | 33 | Jun 1, 2006 | Jun 6, 2006 | $14,854 |
| OEBFP | long | 15 | May 31, 2006 | Jun 2, 2006 | $3,939 |
| OEBPR | long | 50 | Mar 16, 2006 | Apr 11, 2006 | $12,930 |
| OEBOP | long | 100 | Feb 21, 2006 | Mar 16, 2006 | ($43,140) |
| OEBOO | long | 100 | Feb 16, 2006 | Mar 16, 2006 | ($38,140) |
| OEBNM | long | 400 | Jan 23, 2006 | Feb 8, 2006 | ($114,560) |
| OEBNN | long | 350 | Jan 23, 2006 | Feb 8, 2006 | ($143,990) |
| OEBNO | long | 37 | Feb 6, 2006 | Feb 7, 2006 | $4,018 |
| OEBBP | long | 200 | Jan 18, 2006 | Jan 23, 2006 | ($72,280) |
| OEBBQ | long | 300 | Jan 20, 2006 | Jan 23, 2006 | ($12,585) |
| OEBBQ | long | 300 | Jan 20, 2006 | Jan 20, 2006 | $2,580 |
| OEBNP | long | 100 | Jan 20, 2006 | Jan 20, 2006 | $2,860 |
| OEBBQ | long | 100 | Jan 18, 2006 | Jan 18, 2006 | $1,860 |
Past results are not necessarily indicative of future results.
These results are based on simulated or hypothetical performance results that have certain inherent limitations. Unlike the results shown in an actual performance record, these results do not represent actual trading. Also, because these trades have not actually been executed, these results may have under-or over-compensated for the impact, if any, of certain market factors, such as lack of liquidity. Simulated or hypothetical trading programs in general are also subject to the fact that they are designed with the benefit of hindsight. No representation is being made that any account will or is likely to achieve profits or losses similar to these being shown.