Ruby NQ100 M
I stand corrected in my previous review:
"While the system has performed well since I started the subscription in August 2007, I have two minor problems. One with the vendor, and one with C2. First, the vendor states that the max # of positions is 13. Yet, at the time of this review, the system is holding 15.
Second, C2 continues to report system performance with margin. In the case of Ruby, it's 100% margin. In the case of some futures systems it is way more. I believe the only rational way to report performance for apples to apples comparison is to show results with no margin and let the user decide on leverage"
Dr. Koch is correct - the system is only holding 13 positions. I was confused by the way C2 shows this.