It's clear he needs to do a bit of work on his new strategy. Losses are still larger than gains. I'm going to step aside.

It's holding the same losing position for two consecutive weekends and bearing ~5% drawdowns.

I have autotraded Venters for almost one month. I like the concept of exploiting a pair that few people follow and I think the system is a sound one with a good developer behind. Unfortunately I went through one of these periods that happen when actual performance deviate from the expected and I give the developer the benefit of the doubt given unusual volaitility. I unsuscribed but on the ground that it was not suitable for my objectives. I'll come back if and when I realize that it fits my need.

Seems to be consistent in 'normal' markets. Does best with its short-duration trades. Lost a bit of confidence in this system when it took a $200 loosing trade into a weekend earlier this month and came out on Monday with a $1000 loss--the 5% descretion that the developer cites in his description should have avoided the weekend in light of the euro crisis.

System gets hurt by deep DD over weekend trades. If this issue is resolved, maybe 3-4 stars.

I agree with the previous reviewer. This is one of the most worry-free systems on C2 in both its trading style and instrument. The developer is very professional and great at communicating and answering questions promptly, and the results are better than C2 suggests if you trade with a good broker. Too many reviewers judge a system by a few losing trades, but the fact that they still chose to give this system 3 stars is a testament to its quality.

Writing this review in response to several of the previous postings. Vendor has demonstrated that he has a system which can be traded profitably over a period of 5-6 months. While I do agree that several recent trades have been less than inspirational, a few trades in the context of overall system performance in my view do not warrant a jump to negative ratings. 4/5 for overall return thus far, and good communication from vendor.

The Vendor should take profit of the trade after the draw down since this trade achieve good profit and would have recouped 1/2 of the preceding draw down. Most of the profit were take with less than 200, why NOT this one when its profit is around 500 and did not seem to run up and stead reverse. So there is inconsistency the the money management scheme and this mishap well likely hurt the system performance and will likely cause the system first loss this month. Hopefully the system will revert to its previous consistency to help its subscribers building good equity.

I completely agree with previous reviewer. Looks like Vendor is desperately chasing the market trying to quickly recoup recent losses. Losing positions are being held longer and longer and a losing position is held over the weekend once again.