The fills shown in the closed trades are accurate, even conservative. My fills are typically better than those shown. I've looked at hundreds of systems. I've developed dozens of systems. I've been extremely pleased with Tango. I'm trading it exclusively right now.
Great System: Read the full review here.....I have been subscribing for 3 weeks now. There was one trade in Yen that was down 130+ pips and had no stoploss. I sent a message to Hawk and he responded very soon thereafter. He gave the price target and said it will hit that target within 2 days. It did. IF you can stand some large drawdowns, have have high leverage, this system will do you good. Just look at the high percent of win trades :)
Though the stats look impressive, I am not impressed with the way that losing trades are never closed. He leaves them open, till the market turns around. This is going to burn up some people's accounts, but one of these days the market will continue to move in an unfavourable position and will burn up his own account. He went long on GBP/USD and at one stage was $185 400 down. The price of GBP is now trending up again, but last week it very much looked like it would continue downwards. No one can predict the market several weeks in advance.
WAY WAY WAY too many signals each day. Get 30-50 emails or more some days. For autotraders, this would be a disaster. For daytraders, it will drive you nuts with constant cancellations and adjustments.
If provider can bring this under control, will be happy to revise comment...
The first and last trade here was on 5/26/06. Now 6/22/06 and nothing happened in the past 4 weeks.
Now getting probably into even more difficulty times with lower volatilities.
Yesterday I've sent an private message to the system creator what's going on (new system, out-of-town etc.?) but no reactions. Very sad.
It doesn't make any sense to subscribe to a system for weeks (even it's free) and it looks like dead (actually I've got the impression that a lot other of trading system are dead/almost dead,too).
It would be just fair to subscribers to get a message here or via email.
For me I am going now to unsubscribe it since waiting for nothing makes no sense to me.
Looks good on paper but it's IMPOSSIBLE to make money in real life. The auto trading through C2/Fx-auto creates slippage of at least 5-6 pips per trade. Besides that, the provider adds to losing positions and losers are much bigger than winners. That's usually a sure sign of eventual dissaster. If the provider would keep the lot size the same and send signals directly through fx-auto then it would have potential to be a good system.
Real rocket ship! Appreciate that vendor takes quick losses with stops but has great winners, I trade only 1 contract at this moment but only today system earned me more than 1500Dollars and mmore before. Keep me this happy! And by the way, nonetheless the good results and maybe its worth, i hope vendor will not charge 250$ like other systems in the future. Still young system, take care
Looking at the raw pips, one of the best forex systems on here. I put a 100 pip stop on all positions and don't average into posistions, this has helped me from the big drawdowns while kept me in all the winners.
It is very un-practical to buy 20 ES & 20 NQ at one time unless you are trading with a $150k account. The system was doing good till the market turned down and then still there were mostly long signals -I need somebody smarter than me -thats why I subscribe.
Ouch, first two trades with Timac have gone south fast. Doing only forex, 160 pip loss on one, still waiting on the other but down 200 pips on that one. Only with system less than a week. Be Careful!
It seems a non-mechanic discretionary system. The System Vender performs great so far but tends to bet heavily with his firm believe against the market trend – resulting either huge gain or loss (risky). An outstanding young system needs to be observed for longer period for stability.
Been on the trial for a couple weeks. Not too bad, so far 53 round trip trades and 138 pips; this from actual trading (not C2 fills). For me, I average only 3 pips per trade so it won't take much to send me into the red with this one. Performance has improved over the last few days though, so I'm sticking with it.
Although the trading system has been recently shortened from the four major to two majors now (ie USD-YEN and GBP-USD) there are just too many signals and too many cancellations within minutes. I follow them for some weeks on the Open Instant Trade Messenger (ITM) window since I am going mad opening all emails. But still very confusing to me. It is a fast system, of course, but a little bit "too fast" for me to follow :-)
Still new on collective2 and in the 'learning mode' but try to limit the amount of signals otherwise I am now never sure whether I can trust a signal and not cancelled a few minutes later. Better to have 3,4 or 5 signals/day and that's it.
Whats the matter, the system has general very successful alerts during May-06, and suddenly its totally disabled since 24-May... anybody there?
System Creater... please respond.
Subscribed for the 22 day trial. Great first week, 400 pips up, but ended with 62 round trip trades, and a grand total of only 17 pips. Easy to follow and auto-trade.
Tough to stay with it, but if you have the stomach, this system and it's creator have the pedigree to make real $ for you. I have known the creator for 2 years and can vouch for his integrity - worth something in this game
After subscribing to this system for more than six months, I finally gave up. This strategy should work for vendor, but not for followers because of huge slippage. Look at the intraday chart, you will know what I mean.
Good system. Sometimes cannot get the same price as the system does. Very astute trading. Worst feature is the fact that there are frequent additions to trades. I would recommend it to anyone looking for good profit.
Results were good when I was subscribed. Luckily I got out before the current drawdown. I think Consensus was more interested in a 100% trade record than using stops.
